You don’t have to look far for proof that this country must cut its dependence on fossil fuels and develop cleaner sources of energy.
It can be found in the oil-slicked Gulf of Mexico. It can be found in China’s aggressive efforts to win the global competition for green technologies and green jobs. And, most urgently, it can be found in the inexorable math of accumulating greenhouse gas emissions.
And where is the Senate? After a year of talking, utterly nowhere. Paralyzed by partisanship, hobbled by indifferent leadership, it is unable to muster a majority (much less a filibuster-proof 60 votes) for even a modest energy and climate bill.
Senators John Kerry and Joseph Lieberman presented a good but far from perfect bill on Wednesday that would at least point the country in the right direction. For the first time, it would set a price on carbon emissions that are now dumped without penalty into the atmosphere. A price signal is an essential prerequisite for reducing emissions and for shifting American industry to cleaner, less polluting sources of energy.
The measure would also invest widely in low-carbon technologies, renewable fuels, more efficient vehicles and mass transit.
The two senators (originally three, until Lindsey Graham jumped ship) have worked hard to fashion a worthy companion to a similar measure passed by the House in June of last year. They deserve thanks. Yet the bill has no chance unless President Obama steps up.
Mr. Obama pledged to “engage” with the Senate to pass a comprehensive energy and climate bill “this year.” This was one of those ticket-punching statements that isn’t going to change any minds. What he should have said is that he is going to hammer on the Senate until it does what this country needs.
Mr. Kerry and Mr. Lieberman doled out all sorts of rewards to various industries to bring them aboard, and the bill has been endorsed by several big power producers, including Duke Energy. But Republicans remain unanimously opposed and Democrats from industrial states are not enthusiastic.
Getting the Senate to act is not just a matter of leadership for Mr. Obama. It is also a matter of honor and sound science. At the Copenhagen climate conference in December, the president — who did much to rescue that meeting from failure — committed this country to a 17 percent reduction in greenhouse gas emissions by 2020.
什么是直肠癌直肠癌病因得了直肠癌怎么办直肠癌治疗费用治疗（晚期）直肠癌需要多少钱直肠癌转移直肠癌晚期直肠癌晚期能活多久直肠癌晚期治疗费用直肠癌传染吗直肠癌能治好吗有效治愈直肠癌直肠癌治愈率晚期直肠癌的治疗偏方直肠癌晚期症状直肠癌晚期的症状晚期直肠癌症状晚期直肠癌的症状直肠癌晚期的并发症直肠癌早期症状早期直肠癌的症状直肠癌常见的症状直肠癌临床表现直肠癌临床症状如何诊断直肠癌直肠癌的诊断方法大肠癌常用的检查方法治疗直肠癌的方法直肠癌治疗药物治疗直肠癌的新药治疗直肠癌最好的医院治疗直肠癌的医院治疗直肠癌最好的偏方直肠癌治疗偏方治疗晚期直肠癌的偏方治疗直肠癌的中药治疗直肠癌的西药治疗直肠癌的中草药直肠癌康复护理直肠癌术后该吃什么直肠癌病人吃什么好直肠癌术后护理直肠癌吃什么直肠癌饮食直肠癌预防直肠癌的预防如何预防直肠癌什么是结肠癌结肠癌病因得了结肠癌怎么办结肠癌治疗费用结肠癌转移结肠癌晚期结肠癌晚期能活多久晚期结肠癌的治疗费用结肠癌传染吗结肠癌能治好吗有效治愈结肠癌结肠癌的治愈率晚期结肠癌的治疗偏方结肠癌晚期症状结肠癌晚期的症状晚期结肠癌症状晚期结肠癌的症状中期结肠癌的症状结肠癌晚期的并发症结肠癌早期症状早期结肠癌的症状结肠癌常见症状结肠癌临床表现结肠癌临床症状如何诊断结肠癌结肠癌的诊断方法结肠癌症状治疗结肠癌的方法结肠癌治疗药物治疗结肠癌的新药治疗结肠癌最好的医院治疗结肠癌的医院治疗结肠癌最好的偏方治疗结肠癌偏方治疗晚期结肠癌的偏方治疗结肠癌的中药治疗结肠癌的西药治疗结肠癌的中草药结肠癌术后该吃什么结肠癌病人吃什么好结肠癌术后护理结肠癌吃什么结肠癌饮食结肠癌的预防如何预防结肠癌什么是食道癌食道癌病因得了食道癌怎么办食道癌治疗费用食道癌转移食道癌晚期食道癌晚期能活多久食道癌晚期的治疗费用食道癌传染吗食道癌能治好吗有效治愈食道癌食道癌治愈率食道癌晚期症状食道癌晚期的症状晚期食道癌症状晚期食道癌的症状食道癌中期症状食道癌晚期的并发症食道癌早期症状早期食道癌的症状食道癌常见的症状食道癌临床表现食道癌临床症状如何诊断食道癌食道癌的诊断方法治疗食道癌的方法食道癌治疗药物治疗食道癌的新药治疗食道癌最好的医院治疗食道癌的医院治疗食道癌最好的偏方治疗食道癌的偏方治疗晚期食道癌的偏方食道癌晚期治疗偏方治疗食道癌的中药治疗食道癌的西药治疗食道癌的中草药食道癌康复护理食道癌术后该吃什么食道癌患者吃什么好食道癌术后护理食道癌吃什么食道癌饮食食道癌的预防食道癌如何预防
That is the target in the Senate bill and the bare minimum that scientists believe is necessary to get the United States on track toward reducing its emissions by 80 percent by midcentury — which it must do to help the world avoid the worst impacts of a warming planet.
Despite industry pressure, the bill preserves much of the Environmental Protection Agency’s regulatory authority to reduce emissions from power plants. And on Thursday, the agency issued a rule saying that it planned to address only the biggest emitters. But while the E.P.A.’s authority is important, Congress must still act. A broad market-based scheme would be much more effective than a patchwork of regulations.
The United States is the world’s second-largest emitter of greenhouse gases after China. Until America moves seriously to control emissions, the big developing countries will not do so. As Mr. Obama knows well, all senators like to imagine themselves as world leaders. Well, here’s his chance, and their chance, to lead.
deveal drupal dream dring
It can be found in the oil-slicked Gulf of Mexico. It can be found in China’s aggressive efforts to win the global competition for green technologies and green jobs. And, most urgently, it can be found in the inexorable math of accumulating greenhouse gas emissions.
And where is the Senate? After a year of talking, utterly nowhere. Paralyzed by partisanship, hobbled by indifferent leadership, it is unable to muster a majority (much less a filibuster-proof 60 votes) for even a modest energy and climate bill.
Senators John Kerry and Joseph Lieberman presented a good but far from perfect bill on Wednesday that would at least point the country in the right direction. For the first time, it would set a price on carbon emissions that are now dumped without penalty into the atmosphere. A price signal is an essential prerequisite for reducing emissions and for shifting American industry to cleaner, less polluting sources of energy.
The measure would also invest widely in low-carbon technologies, renewable fuels, more efficient vehicles and mass transit.
The two senators (originally three, until Lindsey Graham jumped ship) have worked hard to fashion a worthy companion to a similar measure passed by the House in June of last year. They deserve thanks. Yet the bill has no chance unless President Obama steps up.
Mr. Obama pledged to “engage” with the Senate to pass a comprehensive energy and climate bill “this year.” This was one of those ticket-punching statements that isn’t going to change any minds. What he should have said is that he is going to hammer on the Senate until it does what this country needs.
Mr. Kerry and Mr. Lieberman doled out all sorts of rewards to various industries to bring them aboard, and the bill has been endorsed by several big power producers, including Duke Energy. But Republicans remain unanimously opposed and Democrats from industrial states are not enthusiastic.
Getting the Senate to act is not just a matter of leadership for Mr. Obama. It is also a matter of honor and sound science. At the Copenhagen climate conference in December, the president — who did much to rescue that meeting from failure — committed this country to a 17 percent reduction in greenhouse gas emissions by 2020.
什么是直肠癌直肠癌病因得了直肠癌怎么办直肠癌治疗费用治疗（晚期）直肠癌需要多少钱直肠癌转移直肠癌晚期直肠癌晚期能活多久直肠癌晚期治疗费用直肠癌传染吗直肠癌能治好吗有效治愈直肠癌直肠癌治愈率晚期直肠癌的治疗偏方直肠癌晚期症状直肠癌晚期的症状晚期直肠癌症状晚期直肠癌的症状直肠癌晚期的并发症直肠癌早期症状早期直肠癌的症状直肠癌常见的症状直肠癌临床表现直肠癌临床症状如何诊断直肠癌直肠癌的诊断方法大肠癌常用的检查方法治疗直肠癌的方法直肠癌治疗药物治疗直肠癌的新药治疗直肠癌最好的医院治疗直肠癌的医院治疗直肠癌最好的偏方直肠癌治疗偏方治疗晚期直肠癌的偏方治疗直肠癌的中药治疗直肠癌的西药治疗直肠癌的中草药直肠癌康复护理直肠癌术后该吃什么直肠癌病人吃什么好直肠癌术后护理直肠癌吃什么直肠癌饮食直肠癌预防直肠癌的预防如何预防直肠癌什么是结肠癌结肠癌病因得了结肠癌怎么办结肠癌治疗费用结肠癌转移结肠癌晚期结肠癌晚期能活多久晚期结肠癌的治疗费用结肠癌传染吗结肠癌能治好吗有效治愈结肠癌结肠癌的治愈率晚期结肠癌的治疗偏方结肠癌晚期症状结肠癌晚期的症状晚期结肠癌症状晚期结肠癌的症状中期结肠癌的症状结肠癌晚期的并发症结肠癌早期症状早期结肠癌的症状结肠癌常见症状结肠癌临床表现结肠癌临床症状如何诊断结肠癌结肠癌的诊断方法结肠癌症状治疗结肠癌的方法结肠癌治疗药物治疗结肠癌的新药治疗结肠癌最好的医院治疗结肠癌的医院治疗结肠癌最好的偏方治疗结肠癌偏方治疗晚期结肠癌的偏方治疗结肠癌的中药治疗结肠癌的西药治疗结肠癌的中草药结肠癌术后该吃什么结肠癌病人吃什么好结肠癌术后护理结肠癌吃什么结肠癌饮食结肠癌的预防如何预防结肠癌什么是食道癌食道癌病因得了食道癌怎么办食道癌治疗费用食道癌转移食道癌晚期食道癌晚期能活多久食道癌晚期的治疗费用食道癌传染吗食道癌能治好吗有效治愈食道癌食道癌治愈率食道癌晚期症状食道癌晚期的症状晚期食道癌症状晚期食道癌的症状食道癌中期症状食道癌晚期的并发症食道癌早期症状早期食道癌的症状食道癌常见的症状食道癌临床表现食道癌临床症状如何诊断食道癌食道癌的诊断方法治疗食道癌的方法食道癌治疗药物治疗食道癌的新药治疗食道癌最好的医院治疗食道癌的医院治疗食道癌最好的偏方治疗食道癌的偏方治疗晚期食道癌的偏方食道癌晚期治疗偏方治疗食道癌的中药治疗食道癌的西药治疗食道癌的中草药食道癌康复护理食道癌术后该吃什么食道癌患者吃什么好食道癌术后护理食道癌吃什么食道癌饮食食道癌的预防食道癌如何预防
That is the target in the Senate bill and the bare minimum that scientists believe is necessary to get the United States on track toward reducing its emissions by 80 percent by midcentury — which it must do to help the world avoid the worst impacts of a warming planet.
Despite industry pressure, the bill preserves much of the Environmental Protection Agency’s regulatory authority to reduce emissions from power plants. And on Thursday, the agency issued a rule saying that it planned to address only the biggest emitters. But while the E.P.A.’s authority is important, Congress must still act. A broad market-based scheme would be much more effective than a patchwork of regulations.
The United States is the world’s second-largest emitter of greenhouse gases after China. Until America moves seriously to control emissions, the big developing countries will not do so. As Mr. Obama knows well, all senators like to imagine themselves as world leaders. Well, here’s his chance, and their chance, to lead.
deveal drupal dream dring
RSS Feed